Court Declares Lawsuit on US Credit Card Late Fees Rule to Remain in Texas

Texas Holds Ground on Credit Card Fee Battle

Recent legal developments have shifted the dynamic in a critical lawsuit concerning credit card late fees. A federal appeals court decided that the case will remain rooted in Texas despite efforts to move it to Washington, D.C. The lawsuit focuses on a new rule to cap credit card late fees at $8.

Legal Setback for CFPB in Jurisdiction Tussle

The U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has encountered a hurdle. The agency aimed to shift a lawsuit challenging its ruling on credit card late fees out of Texas and bring the case before a judge in Washington. The case has seen significant pushback from business and banking groups, who argue that the CFPB's enforcement of "junk fees" regulations was overreaching.

The CFPB's directive restricts credit card issuers from charging more than $8 for late payments. This would apply to issuers with over one million open accounts. The rule would also require issuers to justify higher fees by showing they are necessary to cover costs.

Texas Court Favored by Plaintiffs

Business groups, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the American Bankers Association, won legally. They successfully argued that the case should stay in Texas. The district court in Fort Worth, favored by litigants for its conservative-leaning, has two active Republican-appointed judges.

Mark Pittman, a U.S. District Judge, and former President Donald Trump appointee, played a pivotal role in the proceedings. He previously halted the implementation of the CFPB's rule upon request from the business groups. When Judge Pittman attempted to transfer the case to Washington, the appeals court intervened, leading to the current ruling.

Fort Worth's Jurisdiction Affirmed

Judge Pittman had pointed out that the plaintiffs mainly were out-of-state entities. The case involved actions by officials in Washington, D.C., with the sole local connection being the Fort Worth Chamber of Commerce. Nevertheless, the three-judge panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals directed Pittman to keep the case in Texas. They ruled that moving the case represented a misapplication of legal standards and an overstep of judicial discretion.

ALSO READ: Texas Federal Judge Blocks $8 Cap on Credit Card Late Fees, Citing Potential Constitutional Issues

Economic Weight of Credit Card Fees

The magnitude of credit card late fees in the U.S. economy is noteworthy. Last year alone, total late fees amounted to over $14 billion. The average fee was $32, far above the CFPB's proposed $8 cap. The litigation's outcome could significantly impact the credit card industry's revenue streams.

Nationwide Interest in Credit Card Late Fees

U.S. Circuit Judge Don Willett, another Trump appointee, underlined the case's national resonance. He indicated that the rule would affect credit card issuers and customers across the United States. This declaration reaffirms the Texas court's stake in a litigation that has sparked widespread consumer and business interest.

The legal debate surrounding the CFPB's late fee cap continues to garner attention. With billions at stake, the case's ramifications promise to extend far beyond the borders of Texas. As further developments arise, the financial industry and consumers remain alert to the lasting effects this pivotal lawsuit may have on credit card fee practices.

RELATED TOPIC: Your Next Steps After Losing a Lawsuit to a Credit Card Company

Tags

Court Declares Lawsuit, US Credit Card Late Fees, Remain in Texas

© 2023 Lawyer Herald All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission.