The Environmental Integrity Project recently conducted an illuminating study. Their analysis included 50 plants built or expanded over the past 12 years. These facilities are primarily located in Texas and Louisiana, with others spread across Mississippi, Iowa, Alabama, Kentucky, and Pennsylvania.
Disproportionate Effect on Minority Communities
The study's demographic analysis reveals a troubling trend. Nearly 600,000 residents live within a 3-mile radius of the analyzed facilities, and two-thirds of these residents are people of color.
Financial figures are equally startling. Thirty-two out of the 50 facilities have received nearly $9 billion in state and local subsidies. This financial support continues despite the facilities' poor compliance with air pollution control measures.
Violations and Environmental Impacts
The report documents frequent violations among the scrutinized plants. Of the 50, 42 have breached air pollution control permits at least once in the last three years. This data comes from the Environmental Protection Agency's Enforcement and Compliance History Online database.
One notable case involves Indorama, a Thailand-based company. In 2015, it secured a $1.5 million grant from Louisiana for a Westlake facility. This financial aid came with an expectation: the company must adhere to environmental regulations. Yet, by the first half of 2019, the facility emitted volatile organic compounds far exceeding legal limits.
The 50 plants released around 63 million tons of greenhouse gases in 2021. This substantial contribution to pollution contradicts public commitments to environmental safety and health.
ALSO READ: Lawmakers Introduce Bill Offering Up to $15,000 Tax Credit to First-Time Rhode Island Homebuyers
Questioning Environmental Oversight
These facilities often find homes in regions with lax environmental scrutiny. The Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality and the Commission on Environmental Quality of Texas have combined budgets that pale in comparison to the subsidies received by these facilities.
Such lax oversight has profound implications for communities along the Gulf Coast. The petrochemical industry's air pollutants heavily contaminate this region. Louisiana's "Cancer Alley" is a stark example, representing 85 percent of U.S. petrochemical production and suffering from significantly elevated cancer rates.
The Financial and Social Toll of Industrial Pollution
This comprehensive analysis raises essential questions about allocating public funds to corporations that flout environmental laws. While these subsidies aim to foster economic development, the ecological and health costs born by minority communities cannot be ignored.
The findings underscore a critical need for heightened regulatory enforcement and a reevaluation of subsidy policies. Mainly because they apply to industries with a track record of environmental violations. These measures are crucial to protect public health and ensure environmental integrity.
With billions at stake in fiscal terms and the well-being of vulnerable communities, the call for accountability grows louder. The discrepancies between subsidy allocations and environmental compliance highlight a pressing need for systemic change.
Efforts to address these injustices must navigate complex economic and regulatory landscapes. Yet, the well-being of minority communities and the health of our environment demand urgent and comprehensive action.
