The unanimous ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court has drawn attention, effectively dismantling attempts by states to disqualify former President Donald Trump from his potential presidential run. With implications far past Colorado, the decision also dampens similar challenges in other locales.
Trump Returns to the Forefront
Colorado levied an argument, attempting to ban Trump from their Republican primary, citing his alleged involvement in the Capitol riot of 2021. The Supreme Court, however, determined that the power to exact this disqualification exists solely with Congress, not individual states. This judicial decree now paves the path for Trump to compete in Colorado's primary, which falls on Tuesday.
Another Trump-Biden Faceoff on the Horizon?
Being the frontrunner for the Republicans, the likelihood of Trump facing off with current Democratic President, Joe Biden, remains high as the November general election draws closer. Following the court's ruling, Trump immediately claimed victory via his Truth Social media platform, hailing it as a "big win for America." Boosting his campaign momentum, this victory message resulted in a subsequent fundraising email circulating among his supporters.
The Winning Tale of an Insurrectionist
Dejection clouded Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold, who expressed her disappointment at the ruling, contending that "Colorado should be able to bar oath-breaking insurrections from our ballot." The verdict elicited a mixed response from CREW (Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington), who put the case forward in Colorado. Despite acknowledging the court's failure to meet at the moment, Crew nevertheless saw it as a democratic win, sealing Trump's future as a historical insurrectionist.
Where Does State Power Cease and Federal Power Begin?
Simultaneously, Maine and Illinois followed Colorado's footsteps in attempting to remove Trump from their ballots, attributing similar reasons. However, these efforts came to a standstill while the challenge against the Colorado ruling sought attention at the Supreme Court.
The court expressed its conclusion clearly. It affirmed that states reserve the authority to disqualify individuals from holding or attempting to secure state office. Still, states are not endowed with the constitutional power to enforce Section 3 regarding federal positions, particularly the presidency.
The Contentious Fourteenth Amendment
A unanimous agreement among the nine justices highlighted the limitation of the 14th Amendment's provisions against federal officials and candidates, restricted by the federal agency and not by the states. The Civil War-era Amendment, particularly its Section 3, bars federal, state, and military officials who have "engaged in insurrection or rebellion" against the U.S. from retaining public office.
ALSO READ: Trump's Bid to Appeal $464M Fraud Trial Penalty Fails, NY Appellate Court Rejects $100M Bond
Unanimity Amidst Turmoil
Justice Amy Coney Barrett, one of the court's justices, wrote separately to emphasize the agreement of all nine justices on the case, drawing attention to the important message this sends to Americans. Yet, the court's three liberal justices delivered a counterpoint, suggesting that the majority's decision could restrict other possible enforcement methods by proclaiming "that a disqualification for insurrection can only occur when Congress enacts a specific legislation."
A legal scholar, Ray Brescia, noted that the court's decision eliminates a situation of a "patchwork of states with different processes." At the same time, Atiba Ellis found concerns with the decision's far-reaching consequences, possibly altering constitutional interpretation matters that were not within the scope of the current case.
Eyes on Super Tuesday
Republican voters across 15 states, including Colorado, are set to vote on Super Tuesday, a critical marathon contest. Trump is expected to dominate these primaries, firmly securing his position against his only remaining contender, former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley, in every battleground. This Supreme Court decision essentially shapes the immediate political landscape of 2024's presidential race, marking a critical conjunction in the history of America's judiciary and politics.
