In a distinctive ruling that could pose a significant threat to freedom of speech and news gathering, the full 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, based in New Orleans, ruled on Tuesday that officials could neither be sued over the arrest of a citizen journalist for asking questions to a police source.
The Powers of the Press Get Tested
Priscilla Villarreal, a citizen journalist based in Laredo, who runs an extensively followed Facebook page broadcasting crime, events, and other city-centric news, fell foul of prosecutorial charges. Villarreal faced two felony counts of misusing information after she released the identities of victims involved in a suicide and a car crash on her Facebook prediction, information she had obtained after speaking to a police officer based in Laredo.
The primary charges under the statute classify soliciting non-public information from a government official to gain a benefit as a crime. In this case, the prosecutors claimed the benefit was an increase in Facebook followers.
In 2018, Villarreal found some respite when a state court judge dismissed the charges, categorizing the law as unconstitutionally vague. This dismissal led Villarreal to sue in the subsequent year. Initially, the presiding judge ruled that the officers and prosecutors were covered by qualified immunity, but a 2-1 panel turned this ruling around in 2021.
The Repercussions of the Ruling - When Justice Prevails?
Judge Edith Jones, an appointee of former Republican President Ronald Reagan, ruled on Tuesday and stated that law enforcement officers were not obligated to pre-empt the law's constitutionality before carrying out the arrest. Judge Jones controversially labeled Villarreal's martyr-like portrayal for the cause of journalism as "inappropriate," asserting that Villarreal had merely used the law to boost her reputation.
She hammered home her point by making the comparison to legit mainstream media outlets, which generally withhold victim identities until publicly released by relevant officials or family. Villarreal, she said, was capitalizing on the tragedies of others to uplift her reputation and career.
ALSO READ: Oregon Jury Orders Berkshire Hathaway's PacifiCorp to Compensate Wildfire Victims with $62M
Divisions in the Court
The ruling created a divide among the court's conservatives, with four joining three judges appointed by Democrats to dissent against the outcome. These included U.S. Circuit Judge James Ho, an appointee of Republican former President Donald Trump, who said the majority had endorsed an "extreme vision where public officials and legislators can overturn federal constitutional rights at whim."
The Importance of Sound Legal Counsel
Villarreal's lawyer, JT Morris, associated with the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, stated that they intend to seek a review from the Supreme Court, given the case's significance for free expression and constitutional accountability. His poignant statement underscores the vital role of a seasoned and proficient legal attorney in instances like this.
Learn more about your rights, legal protection measures, and the importance of having an experienced lawyer.
