In April 2023, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis inked the controversial HB 543, commonly known as Florida's Permitless Carry bill or "Constitutional Carry." DeSantis and other proponents see this as a significant milestone in firearms law since it now legally allows gun owners in Florida to carry arms in public spaces without the supposed 'infringement' of government mandates, including required training.
The Controversy Surrounding "Permitless Carry"
The respective lawmakers and the Governor have firmly believed that the legislation guarantees the constitutional rights of law-abiding Floridians. However, this argument has drawn significant criticism and has been deemed misleading. A fundamental question at the heart of these critiques is: Does Gov. Ron DeSantis' 'Permitless Carry' Law contradict the U.S. Constitution?
The Supreme Court's Role in the United States
The United States Supreme Court makes the last decision on the constitutionality of laws, including those about the Second Amendment and firearm regulations. The Court recently reviewed a century-old New York legislation restricting concealed handgun license issuance by requiring applicants to justify carrying a firearm. The passage of Florida's permitless carry law focuses on the constitutional implications of such laws.
ALSO READ: Chicago Shootings: At Least 7 Killed & 41 Hurt During Weekend Gun Violence in Second City
Unraveling the Permitless Carry in Context and Comparison
The New York law also allowed the state to deny carry permits if it found the stated reasons insufficient. Despite its stringency, the Supreme Court struck the law as unconstitutional. Advocates of gun rights looked forward to an acknowledgment that the Second Amendment guaranteed public carry rights of firearms. However, even the Supreme Court, with its 6-3 conservative majority, did not uphold this.
In his concurring opinion, Justice Brett Kavanaugh added crucial context by highlighting that states were not barred from imposing licensing prerequisites for carrying handguns. He underscored that 43 states upheld requirements that ranged from fingerprint submission to evidence of background and mental health checks, and even proven training in handling firearms.
Evaluating The Passage and Popularity of the Law
Despite a 77% disapproval rating and being supported by purely partisan sentiments, Florida's Permitless Carry law was passed, albeit under a misleading tag. The bill was jam-packed with other necessary legislation and had faced two previous failed attempts before its successful passage. The misleading name and its march to passing, despite widespread disapproval, call to question the intent and representation of the law.
Expectations and Accountability
Floridians are arguably left questioning their representatives and the Governor. The representatives, including Gov. DeSantis, are rightfully expected to serve the interests of the people and less potent political ambitions. Crafted legislation should aim to promote public safety and not merely fulfill a fantastical interpretation of constitutional rights.
The Importance of Expert Legal Assistance
The controversy surrounding Gov. Ron DeSantis' 'Permitless Carry' law amplifies the need for expert legal assistance in complex legal matters. Skilled legal professionals can dissect intricate issues accurately and diligently, ensuring laws are interpretable in their correct constitutional context. Furthermore, they can provide an unbiased understanding of the legal implications of such legislation on a broader audience, keeping public welfare at the core.
RELATED TOPIC: Key Terms You Need to Know for Criminal Appeals
