Investment banker does not have to draft fraudulent communication to be held liable for fraud, finds Supreme Court

By

The US Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that an investment banker may be held liable under 17 CFR § 240.10b-5 (Rule 10b-5) for sending fraudulent information about a potential investment even if the employee did not draft the correspondence and sent it at the behest of their boss.

In Lorenzo v. Securities and Exchange Commission the court considered of whether Lorenzo, then a director of investment banking at a brokerage firm, committed fraud when, at the request of his boss, he sent two emails to clients about an investment opportunity at a company with assets of $10 million. Lorenzo knew the real valuation of the company's assets was closer to $400,000. Lorenzo copied and pasted the information from his boss and sent the emails anyway.

Full Article

© 2026 Lawyer Herald All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission.

Join the Discussion
More Law & Society
Combs Waterkotte

Combs Waterkotte and the High Stakes of Criminal Defense

New York's Evolving Construction Accident Laws

New York's Evolving Construction Accident Laws: What NYC Personal Injury Attorneys and Accident Victims Need to Know in 2026

Track

Religious Schools Enter Expanding Legal Battle Over Transgender Athletes in Girls' Sports

Mika Domingo

Mika Domingo and the Quiet Architecture of Family Legacy