Trump's Political Action Committee Finances Legal Defense
The Save America PAC, closely associated with Donald Trump, has made substantial payments to a law firm based in Phoenix. This firm is responsible for defending Boris Epshteyn. Epshteyn is a veteran adviser to Trump and faces legal challenges in Arizona.
Official documents show that Save America disbursed $50,000 to Tully Bailey LLP. These funds covered legal aid for Epshteyn and were split into two payments: $40,000 and $10,000.
Boris Epshteyn and the Arizona Fake Electors Scheme
Epshteyn was indicted in April. The charges connect him to a scheme involving fake electors in Arizona. The plan intended to send unauthorized electors for Trump to be counted instead of those for Joe Biden following the 2020 election. Despite these severe allegations, Epshteyn has asserted his innocence.
Michael Bailey of the firm Tully Bailey LLP is Epshteyn's attorney for this case. Bailey, a former U.S. attorney for Arizona, has officially defended Epshteyn since May 9. He was notably present during Epshteyn's arraignment on June 18. The arraignment was postponed due to Bailey's commitments to another client outside of Arizona.
While not explicitly stated, there is a clear link between the payment and Epshteyn's legal defense. No other co-defendants in Arizona or a related Georgia case have acquired direct fund support from Save America like this.
ALSO READ: Trump Gag Order Partially Lifted in High-Profile Hush Money Case, Ahead of Debate with Biden
Examining the Use of Save America Funds
Since 2020, Save America PAC has covered legal costs and broadly supported Trump-related cases. Over $90 million has been spent on legal services, with about $83 million from Save America's coffers. These expenses have backed various legal teams defending Trump in several prominent matters, including the New York hush money trial and the dissolved House Jan. 6 committee investigation.
Two notable co-defendants, Walt Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira of the Mar-a-Lago documents case, also benefited from "legal consulting" payments. However, the records reveal no recent disbursements to firms representing them or other defendants.
The lack of response from Save America and Trump campaign spokespersons leaves several inquiries unanswered. They include questions on their involvement with legal costs for other co-defendants besides Trump and Epshteyn.
Recently, Moussa from the Biden campaign spotlighted Trump's determination to hold onto power. He cited the funding of Epshteyn's defense as an example of Trump's unrelenting efforts.
The uses of Save America funds have been diverse, including a sizable payment to McGuireWoods LLP, representing Trump's former chief of staff, Mark Meadows. Another noteworthy expense was around $175,000 paid to the firm of attorney Stanley Woodward. Woodward described Trump's aides during the Jan. 6 committee hearings and Nauta in the Mar-a-Lago documents case.
As this intricate web of legal and political maneuvers unfolds, it prompts public interest in the ethical and legal boundaries of political funding. Share your perspective on these financial strategies and their broader implications on justice and democracy.
